Monday, April 16, 2018
So, if you visit my Published Works page, you may notice that it has expanded a little recently. That’s because my college’s annual arts magazine and Sonder Midwest’s first-ever issue have published, combined, THREE of my short stories! Sonder published “Important Transmission” (probably my most comical presentation of a sci-fi concept to date), while the arts magazine took “Plumber” and “To Write a Story”. I thought I’d discuss those latter two stories here, though, because…the circumstances of their publication were rather interesting.
Here are three of those peculiarities.
First, the fact that my college’s arts magazine took two of my stories is new on me. Normally they only take one—but last year I did get one story and one photo accepted. Other than that, it’s just been one story at a time. I hope this is a good sign for my writing skills and not a bad sign for submission quantity, but whatever the case may be, it’s rather flattering.
…Except that I submitted three stories, and to be honest, the one that didn’t get published was probably my favorite. Oh well. That means I’ll feel better when I submit it elsewhere.
Second, one of the published short stories, specifically “To Write a Story”, won for me my third Short Fiction Award. I didn’t think that was allowed. I’d won it before with “URCARU” in 2015 and “The Longest Three Days” last year, so I was expecting—and OK with—not acquiring it this year. But I guess it is possible. So to all those who may be attending any academic institution with such an arts award (I’ll tell you my college someday, probably after I’ve graduated), I offer this advice: shoot for the fiction award every single year. Don’t expect it every year maybe, but trying for it will at least get you some good stories in your stories folder.
The weirdest detail, though, is probably Detail Number Three.
Third, and I don’t think I’ve mentioned this before, but this semester I’m also a reporter for the college newspaper (but you may never see those articles in “Published Works”—believe it or not, I’m pretty sure I wasn’t writing fiction). I was attending the arts magazine not only to see if any of my stories had made it in, but also to cover the story of the magazine’s release. It was a pretty big anniversary edition, and I volunteered to take the story because I was pretty confident that I wouldn’t have to worry about getting an award.
And then I did. Which was awesome, make no mistake. But what am I supposed to write for my article? I’ll probably have to close it out something like this:
“Even though this reporter won the Short Fiction Award, he would like to reassure you that everything in this article is absolutely true and he didn’t make up any of this.”
Sunday, April 1, 2018
Hello, loyal and disloyal readers! Happy Easter, Happy April, Happy whatever-you-happen-to-be-celebrating-at-this-moment (maybe the arrival of this blog post, I don't know). Anyway, I thought I'd kick off this month with a few updates.
First is this font size. I think it's more readable, but as I'm writing this it's causing me some formatting headaches. We'll see if it works.
Second, off to the left of this page, you may have noticed a couple of extra features on the “SIDEBAR OF MANY THINGS.” That’s right; after nearly TWO YEARS of blog authorship, I have finally added a “Blog Search” gadget and—probably more importantly—a Subscribe-By-Email gadget. Now you can receive blog update notifications directly to your email address, and in return I promise to spam your account. Again, these posts are published merely twice a month, and I tend to hold all important news until those posts come out.
Third, according to sources I found after a brief Google search, April is the National Month of Inventors, Humor, and Pets. What better way to celebrate that than with Lab Rules, my Monday-Wednesday-Friday cartoon blog that features inventors, humor, and…sort-of pets? Plus, I’m looking into finally installing a “Subscribe” gadget on there as well (and that blog has been online for nearly SIX years). Bit of an oversight on the part of my editor.
Also, as long as you’re checking out Lab Rules, be sure to admire the new poster I’ve put on my blog’s page. Its predecessor was getting kind of old.
That’s all I have for now. Tune in next time for…well, I don’t know really. We’ll find out. You will definitely find out if you subscribe.
Friday, March 16, 2018
News Item the First: I’m trying this new format where I add an extra space under each paragraph to divide everything up a little better. Just thought you should know that.
News Item the Second: For some reason, I now have a Twitter account. You may have seen it already; the handle is “@ultrasonnek”. Anyway, to give myself something to do with this form of social media, I’m starting a new hashtag: “#SuperShortScifiStory”; under this tag, I encourage everyone to post tweet-sized works of science fiction. I’ve done the first, and I also plan to contribute weekly. If you are so inclined, feel free to follow me at @ultrasonnek, and odds are I’ll be more than happy to return the favor. I’m looking for people to follow too.
News Item the Third: This is mostly a reminder, really; I’ve got a couple of science fiction short stories that are soon to be published. Sonder Midwest is coming out in April, and my story “Important Transmission” will be somewhere inside. It’s a flash fiction piece I had fun writing, and I hope it will entertain you as well. Next, my story for Daily Science Fiction is in their publication queue…but I’m not 100 percent sure when the story will get out there. If my last story with them indicates the norm, I will not know when the story will be published until it has already been published. Keep an eye out for it. Once again, signing up for Daily Science Fiction is free, and for that low price you get a short sci-fi story in your inbox every morning.
News Item the Fourth: Wait…dagnabbit, this is more of a review than a news item. At any rate, I recently bought the movie Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. I’d seen it once before in theaters, and I’m hopeless when it comes to resisting good sci-fi.
But when I say “good sci-fi”, I’ve got to be honest—I didn’t buy Valerian for the movie’s story. To put it bluntly, it started out OK but then turned into Avatar; you know, a peaceful and unnaturally idyllic alien race is being persecuted by an old white military dude and the aliens need the heroes’ help to go back to living their unnaturally idyllic lives. I might write a more detailed review about all that later. But the reason I did buy Valerian was because 1) It’s got some of the best sci-fi settings I’ve ever seen, and 2) it included the Doghan Daguis, leathery-winged armadillo aliens who peddle information. Some may call them the Plot-Convenient Aliens, but never has helpful exposition been so much fun.
News Item the Fifth, and This Time I Swear It’s Actual News: Short of the #SuperShortScifiStory project, I’ve been taking a break from writing short stories. My most recent project is a field guide for my book project (although “Field Guide” is honestly not a perfectly accurate term). That’s right; I’m writing nonfiction about fiction, and it’s more fun than it really should be. I’ll probably get back into submitting soon…at some point…in the near future…but until then, publications can breathe a sigh of relief.
News Item the Sixth: There is no News Item the Sixth. I’m out of here.
Thursday, March 1, 2018
Some of you may be wondering, “What exactly does a science fiction writer do in his off hours?”
I personally cannot speak for all of us, but I can certainly tell you one of my favorite non-writing projects: making a background for my laptop.
I’m not content with stock images, to say the least. It’s hard to believe that Microsoft seldom considers its cyberpunk market when designing their interfaces. I suppose I could just go online to find and download a more suitable computational backdrop, but where’s the fun in that?
Good thing computer games come with screenshot capacities.
The whole point of video game design is to be interesting, after all, and I chose to take advantage of this. For a while, my favorite backgrounds came from Portal 2 and its related workshop mods. Here are a few examples:
But then I came across the game Empyrion: Galactic Survival. For those of you unfamiliar and who did not follow the helpful link I provided, Empyrion is an in-development game that is something like a cross between Star Trek and Minecraft. Empyrion allows the players to build their own planetary and orbital bases, as well as vehicles of all sizes and capacities. For example, here’s a capitol vehicle that I built:
In survival mode, your job is to struggle to gather enough resources to build these bases and vehicles, all while fending off alien hordes—then, when your creations are complete, YOU WREAK A BLAZING TRAIL OF DESTRUCTION ACROSS THE GALAXY, LEVELLING EVERY OUTPOST EVEN REMOTELY AFFILIATED WITH THE ALIENS WHO HARRIED YOU WHEN YOU WERE BUT A DEFENSELESS BEGINNER. YOU WILL MAKE THEM PAY! HA HA HA HA—
*ahem* At least, that’s my approach.
There is also a creative mode, in which you can build whatever you want regardless of resources. This mode was how I built my laptop background.
Oh, and one more thing: for my background, I wanted something a little more interesting than just one background. I was after a sci-fi-library aesthetic, but to make it even better I wanted the library to seemingly shift locations. When transitioning from one background to another, the only thing that would change would be the outside scenery. And I did it! This was the result:
This isn’t even the latest iteration of my background. My current “library” has balconies, more holographic stuff, and a classy asymmetrical design for a better outdoor view. Set the background slideshow to 10 seconds, and it gets really distracting.
So here is the simple process of creating a moving-sci-fi-library laptop background like mine, using screenshots from the game Empyrion: Galactic Survival:
1) Set up a Creative game.
2) Learn the finer points of Empyrion construction. You might want to experiment by building some vehicles and stuff first.
3) Build the background building!
4) In the ideal vantage point, be sure to build ONE SPECIFIC SPOT where your in-game character can wedge himself, like a sloping block in an otherwise smooth floor. This ensures you get the same shot every time.
5) Paint and furnish the building to your preferences.
6) Once everything looks a little less hideous, save the building blueprint in your in-game blueprints.
7) Wedge yourself into that ONE SPECIFIC SPOT in your building.
8) Focus your character’s HUD crosshairs on ONE SPECIFIC POINT across the room. Remember that point.
9) Deactivate the HUD.
10) Take the picture!
11) Reactivate your HUD.
12) Go into your blueprints and spawn one of those vehicles you built for practice, preferably one with a long-range warp drive. If you didn’t built a ship use one of the ship blueprints already there.
13) Fly the ship to a new planet.
14) Spawn your background building in the new picturesque location.
15) Wedge your game character into that ONE SPECIFIC SPOT.
16) Repeat steps 7-11.
17) NOTE: If you spawn your building in space, be sure to attach a gravity generator or you won’t be able to wedge yourself into that O.S.S.
18) Realize that your first effort didn’t look so hot. Repeat steps 1-17.
Complicated? You have no idea. I omitted a lot of the early fine-tuning trial and error to figure out what interior configuration was ideal for a background. When you couple that to the fact that I have a custom desktop to arrange around said background…
I like writing. It’s much easier in some ways.
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Happy mid-February, all. This blog post is about something that I started thinking about when I really should have been doing homework and/or job searches. Namely,
When should I insert myself into my own writing?
It was so important that I thought it to myself in an Impact font, size 26. But we all have to return to Times New Roman size 14 at some point (or at least we SHOULD; Times New Roman is the font of life, pun intended). So let me give my three cents on the subject of an author inserting himself into his own writing. I’ll try to keep it brief.
[Sonnek’s Side Note: You might have noticed that I used what I call the Masculine Generic to refer to writers of both sexes; I did not say “…an author inserting his/herself into his/her own writing.” If anyone accuses me of sexism by simplification, I would like to point out that this usage of the masculine denies the male gender their own personal pronoun. For instance, when I say “womankind”, I am clearly referring to only women—but when I say “mankind”, it is more likely that I am referring to all humanity. We guys do not get our own collective and/or exclusive pronoun, people. It’s sad. And don’t even talk to me about “peoplekind.”]
So much for keeping it brief.
First, I exclude from discussion things like autobiographies and other works of nonfiction where that author is actually THERE. Obviously self-insertion is an acceptable necessity in those cases. I refer mostly to works of fiction that are not based on real life.
Well…OK, all good fiction is in some way based on real life and experience; that’s why it resonates with all of us. You know what I mean. Returning to the question, should the author insert his real-life character into these works of fiction?
My quick answer: Um…how do you avoid it?
Let me explain through an example: the ventriloquist comedian Jeff Dunham. For those of you who may be unfamiliar, one of his puppets is a hyperactive purplish-greenish…alien-muppet thing…named Peanut. That’s honestly my best description of it. He has another puppet named José Jalapeño on a Stick; that one is exactly what he sounds like, plus a sombrero.
Anyway, I forget which show this was (and I’m not going to Google it), but Dunham was holding both of these puppets at the same time, making them argue with each other—much to the delight of the audience. At one point in the act, Peanut turned to Jeff directly, accusing him of giving José all the good lines!
“I don’t know what you’re talking about,” replied Jeff. “I’m just observing.”
After the laughter, Peanut said—in a slow, deliberate, loud whisper:
“DON’T GIVE ME THAT CRAP. We know this is ALL YOU.”
That’s one of my favorite Jeff Dunham moments ever. And it applies here.
We are authors. One way to poetically rephrase the noun is to call us ventriloquists in print. We are the ones speaking through the words on the page; there is no way to divorce yourself from the idea that you are generating. Once you are writing your characters, inside their heads as they move through the story, they are all parts of you in some way—that is how you can relate them convincingly and make them come to life.
I do actually recommend beginning writers to base characters upon their own personalities and those of people they know. The “training wheels” of Main Character Perspective is your own mindset; it’s the one you’re most familiar with and therefore can relate the most convincingly. As soon as you can relate motivations, struggles, and perspectives of the world through your eyes, you are better equipped to put on another head and show us a different angle. As weird as that sounds.
[Sonnek’s Side Note: Speaking of weirdness and personal perspective, I have a Twitter account now. You can find it on this site’s “Contact” page, or look for me at “@ultrasonnek”. I don’t really know what to do with the bloody thing, though. Maybe if I get a few more followers, I’ll do more stuff with it.]
Does all this mean that you should fear those who write about serial killers? No…not necessarily. Yes, a writer does have to internalize some of the murderous mindset in order to portray the villain—but knowing your enemy rarely turns one into the enemy. That would be a case of pretty messed-up priorities. At any rate, they know the enemy well enough to defeat him. That’s valuable knowledge. You can still shake Stephen King’s hand, but be careful about it.
HOWEVER—and this is a big however—I do not give license to wish-fulfillment. This is when your “avatar character” in the novel is only there to live out your dream life. It’s pretty easy to spot; if your readers are complaining about a lack of conflict, things going too easily for the Main Character, or other problems like this, odds are you have fallen into the Wish Fulfillment area where your story becomes your vicarious dream world. I’ve certainly done that on a few drafts. You may have read a few books like that, too (probably romance, if I had to guess).
How do you bail yourself out of this? No need to completely scrap the character. Instead, do a little bit of soul-searching. What are your deepest, most teeth-gnashing fears? What irritates you? What do you really consider an obstacle, whether they’re real-life struggles or problems in reaching personal goals? And—this is the big one—what are your character flaws? Oh, I’ll bet all that stuff is in there. You have been sticking to the you-template, after all. So dig those ugly details out, shine a light on them, and make them relevant to the story. Send in your basement monsters to complicate the plot. Then you’re on to something.
In summary? Making a personal appearance in your writing is unavoidable. Just make sure that you aren’t standing in front of the story. Now go out there and be a Story Ninja.
[Sonnek’s Final Side Note: You also might have noticed that I changed my blog title to “Parenthetical Statements.” If you did notice, good eyes. I found that this new title a) sums up my blog purpose—and writing style, since I use many parentheses—and b) “Parenthetical Statements” rolls off the tongue a little faster than “The Inexplicable Author Website of Benjamin Sonnek.” Don’t you think?]
Thursday, February 1, 2018
Hello and welcome, O blog reader dear.
What’s with this rhyming? Please do not fear.
Within my writing expanse I enjoy
To take something simple, and then I employ
My bizarre inclination to add rhythm and rhyme.
I thought I’d do it here. Prob’ly only this time.
So, whether or not my rhyming is nice,
You probably came here for some advice.
Today comes an issue that I will address
That has caused my peace some undue duress.
I touched on it once in my other Inkitt post;
And it’s their one trend that upsets me the most.
It appears so often in manuscripts
That every Inkitt visitor trips
Over the topic whenever they visit
Inkitt’s “Most Popular” homepage. What is it,
This popular trend that one can’t help but see?
It's the theme of the “Alpha Wolf” story. Bear with me.
Most fantasy stories today seem to involve
A werewolf hierarchy, which will revolve
Around wolfish romance—“Alphas” finding a “mate”,
Et cetera, et cetera. So why do I hate it when
Someone brings up this whole “Alpha Wolf” tryst?
Simply because it…well, doesn’t exist.
This Alpha Wolf theory we find so attractive
Was based on a study of wolves that were captive.
Within their confines, the wolves form a structure
Where one holds authority over another.
When Schenkel and Mech made these observations,
We were too quick to apply it to human relations.
“If a human’s aggressive, it’s his wolf tendencies
To act as an alpha o’er all that he sees.
And in his love life—” Well, that’s where I’ll drop it,
But many books take it up from where I stop it.
Between captive and wild, though, there is a difference
That seems, in our fictions, not to have its due deference.
Now, when this research was applied to the wild,
It was found the relation was “parent” and “child.”
The old Alpha structure is a family tree,
With two parents exercising authority
Over their younger children. When the parent dies,
Their offspring—with his family—goes on the rise.
The wolfish leadership is not an instinct
For one type of wolf who will make others sink,
But rather a sign of a family head,
Who loses the throne only after he’s dead.
In your writing, this “Alpha Wolf” myth don’t misuse
For I’ll only see characters with daddy issues.
If you’re writing a romance, please do shun the dance
Of feebly, and falsely, excused “dominance.”
In real life, an “Alpha” is kind of a jerk.
So instead, a more human-like romance should work.
Anyway, thank you for visiting this blog.
I know it’s not easy, trying to slog
Through these endless couplets composed just for you
Only one or two days before they were due.
Have fun with your writing! Okay, now I’m done.
(But I’m not gonna lie…this rhyming was fun.)
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
WARNING: The following story may contain some mixed messages.
I begin today’s lesson with an announcement. The great sci-fi forum known as Daily Science Fiction has agreed to publish another of my short stories! Those of you with scary good memories may remember “Cognito, Ergo Sum”, my first story with them—actually my first professional publication ever—that came out in September of 2016 (P.S. it is a short story, so if you finish it quickly and want to read more there’s always my Published Works page). Anyway, I liked the publication and its community so much that I thought I’d try to put another of my stars into the DSF galaxy. Which leads me to the first warning I’d like to give you all.
1) Do not over-submit to one publication.
DSF had rejected me once before they took “Cognito, Ergo Sum.” Between that story and the one they’ve currently accepted, I made…(checks records)…yes, seven more attempts, and they weren’t shabby attempts if I do say so myself. For me, that is a lot of tries, and I’m certain that some writers have produced a bulk of flash-fictions for a machine-gun-style submission process; as soon as one story gets rejected, they fire right back with another one. Even though I’ve used a similar process a time or two, I’m not really a fan of such a method—I don’t know how attentive editors are to authors’ names, but I don’t want to run the risk of becoming “That One Writer” who makes the staff roll their eyes at your latest shenanigan in their inbox. Seven rejections is probably pretty mild, but it still felt like a lot. I decided to take a different angle with Number Eight—which leads to caution Number Two.
2) Do not base your story on the publication’s rejection letter.
They say to write what you know. I knew a lot about the DSF rejection form letter. Therefore, my latest 500-ish-word effort, “The DSF Rejection Ceremony”, was a brief probably-fictional account of what happens every time a short story is rejected. It wasn’t anything bitter or vindictive; in fact, it was dramatic to the point of comical, not blaming the editors for the disappointing form letter that the writers receive and acknowledging how difficult it must be to reject so much work so frequently. At any rate, it was fun to write, and I kind of figured that the poor DSF editorial staff would get a kick out of it. Heck, rejecting the story would be rather appropriate.
Then, in mid-November of last year, I got an email from DSF. As was my custom, I flinched when I saw it in my inbox.
Contrary to my expectations, it was a brief letter personally written (I assume) by the editors Jonathan and Michele themselves. This was the entire missive:
I love this. I doubt we'll publish it, will have to ponder, but it does feed my narcissism quite nicely! Well done.
- Jonathan & Michele, Daily Science Fiction
After—yes, I keep bringing this up—seven straight rejections, this new communication seemed to be a fresh chance at salvation, even though they said they doubted its chances. But a chance was a chance, so I did the third thing that you really shouldn’t do when submitting:
3) Do not reply to rejection letters.
A lot of publications make it clear that they do not want anyone complaining back to them if one of their stories is not accepted. As a rule, it is a good idea to not address an editor unless they ask for it. But in this case, I judged that A) this wasn’t really a rejection letter, as they implied there was still a chance, and B) this was a personal letter—so there was a better probability that they’d actually read a reply. So I replied. It was basically a list of reasons why it would be a great idea to publish “The DSF Rejection Ceremony.” I kept it polite (if sometimes humorous—I believe it does people good to laugh at emails), tried to keep everything short, and made it clear that—accepted or rejected—I appreciated their time and the opportunity they presented.
I don’t know whether or not it was read. All I know is that, a few days after Christmas, I got another email from DSF. After my customary flinch, I read it.
I have the good fortune of knowing what their form acceptance letter looks like, so this new message appeared to me like an old friend. Well…it wasn’t completely a form letter. At the bottom there was an added postscript:
“We understand that we are being mocked, and yet we are amused.”
That is one of the highest compliments to my writing that I have ever received.
In conclusion, keep an eye out for “The DSF Rejection Ceremony” in the relatively near future—if it’s not on my Published Works page already—and please please please don’t do anything I did when submitting your own short stories. In my humble opinion, the story above is evidence that divine intervention has a sense of humor.
P.S. After I wrote the first draft of this post, the new publication Sonder Midwest replied to one of my queries—they’ve accepted another sci-fi/comedy short story of mine! It’s been a pretty good month here.