Monday, March 18, 2019

READ THIS BOOK



See this book? It's The Initiation by Chris Babu. Now go read it.

Yes, that's right; for once in my book-reviewing life, I am strongly recommending a book. One testimony in favor of the book is the fact that this review is going to be short; I'm writing it at night after shotgunning the last chapters. Those of you who know my stalwart support of Trenton Lee Stewart know, then, how high a compliment I'm giving when I say the The Initiation is like a dark, dystopian The Mysterious Benedict Society. It's that good.

What can I say? It's well-paced and has a recognizable story arc. The main characters--even the less savory ones--are distinguishable and even sympathetic. There's natural tears and natural humor. There's a love triangle (can this really be Benjamin Sonnek saying this?) that sorta makes sense and doesn't bog down the plot. The writer doesn't fall into the rich-people-bad-everyone-else-good trap of other YA dystopia; there is nuance and reasoning behind the world that is built up. The adverbs and filler words I've lamented in recent reviews are hardly a presence, and therefore the writing sucks you in. The descriptions are vivid without being too lengthy. It's complex and doesn't pander. The brainteasers in the story are legit puzzles, which was one factor that brought me back to The Mysterious Benedict Society.

Basically, this is the YA dystopia I've been trying to find for a while now. It's one of the few books I know about that I, in all probability, will buy when I see it in the bookstore. The sequel to The Initiation--namely, The Expedition--is already out, but before I read it, I might wait a little longer for the next book in the series to come out too. After all, if this is going to be a trilogy, I don't want to be left hanging while I wonder whatever's going to happen next. Well done, Chris.




Saturday, March 16, 2019

YA Hopes "Surfacing" Once Again



As spring emerges, so also do I emerge with warm feelings. After some mild disappointment with Erin Bowman's book Contagion, I temporarily swore off the hardcover YA novels, searching for stories in the lesser-known paperbacks in the same general vicinity. My goal was to find a hidden gem in these neglected and often less-lauded works.

I think I've hit something.

Without further ado, I give you Surfacing by Mark Magro, published 2015 by Jolly Fish Press. When it comes to unknown paperbacks, this one fit the bill; it seems to only have eight reviews on Goodreads (which I refuse to read until I'm done here), Surfacing is Magro's only book so far, and Jolly Fish Press doesn't exactly look like Penguin Random House, although it does have a nice website by my standards.

Here's my one-sentence synopsis of Surfacing: In a dystopian future, a teenage boy (Balt) and girl (Zoe) decide to escape an underground laboratory where they are test subjects, using an AI head named Smith to navigate an abandoned complex full of dangers and secrets. It was an interesting plot, and I don't say that just because this book and one of my manuscripts are close enough in setting to shake hands. I think it has merit to make a wave in the YA ocean...

...but let's start with the niggles.

Ultimately, my biggest issue was the way it was written, as in the prose and syntax. Having emerged from Contagion brushing filler words and adverbs off my clothing, it hurt a little bit to dive right back in. Surfacing has a tendency to rely too heavily on "suddenly", "slowly", "began", verb-adverb links (as in "said softly", "ran quickly", etc.), and other details that tripped me up. The book inspired me to do a word search through a couple of my manuscripts--where I ended up declaring a purge of the 100-ish "began"-s I found there. I might not have room to throw stones, but the fact that I deleted about 90 percent of those pesky words from my manuscripts and am bent on cold-blooded mayhem in the others should testify to how unnecessary that word can be.

Surfacing also has a tendency to, um, Coda itself--which is to say, it sometimes goes light on the descriptive side. It left me enough where my imagination could fill in the blanks, but I was never sure if I was doing so correctly. There's a chance that whatever is in my mind and whatever is in Magro's mind are worlds apart, and that unsettled me a little. Downplaying description also undermined some of the intended alarm; I know I was supposed to be surprised when a ginormous praying mantis burst onto the scene, but the way it was introduced felt...a little normal. No pace changes or paragraph breaks--just bam, mantis, and stuff happened. I wanted to get to know the mantis, and heaven knows I did so afterward, but first impressions count. Other things also get yadda-yadda-ed past as well, such as Zoe's involuntary past-seeing ability. She gives the mechanics of this expository talent only a passing, unchallenged thought before moving on.

However, I place Surfacing on a higher tier than Contagion, if only for one reason: multiple times, I caught myself thinking, "Just one more chapter."

What tension the story has is enough to keep you flipping pages. Most characters, even the less-explored ones, were interesting enough for the reader to make an investment in them. Balt and Zoe had enough emotion and personality to be intriguing, and while Smith the AI sounded a little un-AI-ish at times, I cared about him too. Balt starts as a Vulcan-like logic and science machine and Zoe starts as a loner against everything she's known, but they both have their arcs toward more rounded people. The arcs weren't today's popular "girl gets stronger" and "boy learns his lesson" cookie-cutter printouts; if anything, they both learned their lessons and gained their own strengths. Genuine balance there.

The bit that sold the book, though, was the fact that Magro put one past me. There are two major plot twists that drop in the book's final act (and, as another point in the book's favor, I like a discernable beginning-middle-end in my stories, and Surfacing had that). One plot twist, I must admit, pertains to Zoe, and it was pretty obvious; I called it the "Well, duh!" reveal. But then, hot on its heels came another, more comprehensive reveal of such grand scope that...well, I'm not revealing it here. When it was revealed, though, I had another "Well, duh!" moment--only this time it was directed at myself. Thinking back on the whole book, I really should have seen it coming. But I didn't. Kudos, Magro.

Looking back on my Contagion review, it might appear that I am a hypocritical hipster in favoring Surfacing, saying that I like both stories but think they need an adverb-and-filler-word cleansing. Here is my defense against such an accusation: Surfacing has legit interesting characters and moments of grand, overarching surprise, something that Contagion didn't manifest in my eyes. Plus, Surfacing is a debut work by a new author; some syntactical errors are forgivable, whereas Contagion's architect has no such excuse. That's why I'm not searching for Contagion's sequel, but if I get wind of a Surfacing: Part 2, I'll probably hunt it down.

Oh, but that's another thing Surfacing has over Contagion: its ending is less cliffhanger-y. It's a solid stand-alone; Contagion also stands, but it's sort of one-legged in its posture. That's why I conclude this review with a recommendation: if you're not a word-picky reader who wants a medium-sized read with a nice surprise and solid ending to reward your reading dedication, give a thought to Surfacing.

If you'll excuse me, I need to enter my works-in-progress to delete 3,400,848 cases of the word "suddenly".





Friday, March 1, 2019

A "Contagion" of Adverbs



I got enough time last month to read Contagion by Erin Bowman, so to kick off March, here's my review of the book. But let me get one thing straight before I get started here: I hate criticizing books. I'd rather praise a book to the skies than tear it a new one.

Now that I've said that, I can feel you all bracing for the start of my ranting. Well, de-brace yourselves. Contagion is actually a pretty OK book. I think I ruined it for myself.

Here's the one-sentence synopsis: a skeleton crew gets sent to investigate a distress signal on a desolate planet, uncovering a horrible force that threatens everyone--all throughout the universe. There are two main characters: Thea, a scientist's intern, and Nova, a young pilot. FYI, they're both girls; Nova also has lesbian tendencies, if that sweetens the pot for anyone. The reason I say that I ruined this book for myself is simple: I've watched the 1979 movie Alien and played the game
System Shock 2. It was hard to feel surprised when I've seen it all happen before, and Contagion didn't deviate a whole lot from the (minor spoiler alert) alien zombies in space sci-fi theme.

Even so, I have to say the book felt pretty well paced. Unlike a lot of stories I've observed lately, it has a solid beginning, middle, and climactic end. I contrast this plot arc with the movie Alita: Battle Angel; I saw it recently, and while I believe it is an excellent, kick@$$ movie that succeeds where Scarlett Johansson's Ghost in the Shell failed, I also have to admit I couldn't tell where the climax was supposed to be. The edge of one's seat is a terrible thing to waste, and I don't commit to the hallowed seat-edge until I know that everything I've seen has been leading up to this point and $#!* is about to go down.

Contagion does better in that regard. I can legitimately say I was compelled to keep turning pages when the discernable final act reared its head. However...

(Yep, the ripping-a-new-one is about to begin...)

...I wasn't turning pages because I was concerned about anyone.

Maybe I'm just a cold-hearted, envious sociopath, but I didn't click with anyone on the main or secondary character roster. The skeleton crew was composed of the two main characters, a secretive scientist, an a-hole military captain, and three guys. That's about all you can say about them. I felt no concern when (another minor spoiler alert) the three guys started dropping off the radar--even though there was one who had a family back on his planet of origin. I swear nobody cracked a good joke, even a nervous one. They had but the faintest of personality traits that never really shone. The military person--a woman, for what it's worth--was so much of a hardheaded a-hole that I couldn't give her credit when she displayed the occasional sign of character development.

The main characters? If it weren't for their backstories, their personalities were interchangeable--and they reeked of the stereotypical Strong Female Lead. Alita, in the movie that bears her name, at least has some childlike innocence and growth to back up the bad@$$ery. Thea and Nova just have a case of mild determination. People who are after a strong lesbian lead will want to look elsewhere, too; it seemed like Nova's sexual inclination was more thrown in there to uncork the drool taps in agents' and publishers' mouths. I've had this concern that the "Please please send us LGBTQ+ manuscripts" in publishers' wishlists has led to a lack of just scrutiny on their part, and Contagion hasn't really weakened that theory.

On that note, we come to the writing. To be honest, it's Stephen King's worst nightmare, if he has those. We're told as writers to avoid the adverb--especially in Stephen King's book On Writing--but in Contagion, they were...um...contagious. The subject-verb-adverb chain was all over the place ("...he ran quickly...", "...she said spontaneously...", "...it roared incoherently..."), and once, on page 188, I hit a double adverb: "...the ride was momentarily blessedly smooth." There were also a horde of writer sin words: "began", "started", "suddenly", "now", and so on. They were all over the place. I can remember another area where I remember such other horrors occurring:

My writing. Specifically, my writing when I was first learning to write fiction well.

I used those words all the time, and I expended a lot of energy over my years-of-my-manuscripts-not-being-published to smooth out those warps. I'm still coming across them as I edit for the umpteenth time (and believe me, I erased/replaced/reworded a bunch of them while doing some edits this morning). At least I have the "I'm a new-ish writer" excuse, but Bowman has no such defense. She'd had other books published before, and I'm not so sure I want to read another--even the eventual sequel to Contagion. Oh, and another spoiler alert: it ends on a sort-of cliffhanger.

Ultimately, I believe Contagion is a good story; I like both Alien and System Shock 2, after all. The things that trip it up the most are the nondescript characters and the fact that it reads like a manuscript that was edited once, maybe twice, before the publisher thrust it onto the shelves. I would read this book again if Bowman sat on it some more, reworked it, and dear heaven please removed those bales of adverbs and filter words.

It's the universe's only hope.




Friday, February 15, 2019

A Novel Idea


Happy couple-of-days-after-Valentine's-Day! Now that I've shared with you my wealth of knowledge concerning romance writing, I thought we could briefly cover a different, less romantic subject: editing.

See, I am now convinced that the best way to edit your book is to first write a completely different book.

I've heard this advice before, and like I am with all difficult-sounding writing things, I was skeptical at first. I already had a manuscript series I was working on, and doesn't that count as multiple books already? But then I got wrapped up in NaNoWriMo and ended up finishing a new and wholly original story, and I have since set it aside to ferment before I go back in for those second-draft edits. I just hope that manuscript ferments more like beer and less like mold, that's all I can say.

I can't stop writing while that's going on, though, and I don't count all the writing I have to do as a journalist*. Therefore, I decided to go back and edit the second book of a trilogy-ish thing I wrote. Second books are like the middle children of a book series; we know they're there, but I think we don't expect too much of them, and as long as they aren't causing any trouble, we leave them alone.

How are those edits going, you ask?

Let me put it this way: I think the book had about 69,000 words when I first re-opened it. Now it's pushing 74,000. When I had to write the completely original NaNoWriMo book, I needed to describe a whole new world from scratch, something I hadn't done in a while. Thanks to all the writing and critical reading I'd done since I became a writer, I had plenty of experience to make that happen.

Then I noticed my second-book-in-the-series needed a serious descriptive overhaul, amongst its many other edit-able details. I realize this inflating word count sort of flies in the face of Stephen King's "On Writing" book--he advises cutting back on words whenever possible--but I don't mind yet. I think of it as similar to building a snowman: if the snowman is too small, you need to pack more snow on it before making it more smooth and compact.

There you have it; that's why I recommend writing something completely different before editing a manuscript. If nothing else...well, you have my opinion on snowman-building.

Bye for now.


*Final side note: OK, I do count the editorials I write as legit ("fun") writing. That's right--my newspaper gave me my own editorial column. Maybe I'll tell you about it someday, but in the meantime, know that it keeps our readership VERY entertained.




Saturday, February 2, 2019

Romance Writing Tips!


Happy February! In honor of the romantic holiday coming up in a couple weeks, I thought I'd share with all of you my tips for writing hot, steamy romance novels.

...

And there you are.

Have a great Valentine's Day, everyone.



Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Post-Manuscript FAQ




YAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY—
Oh hello. Sorry, I was just celebrating. After two-and-a-half months and a little over 91,000 words, the first draft of my latest YA/sci-fi manuscript is complete! The seed that started as a foray into NaNoWriMo has blossomed into a massive, slightly ugly flower that still has a few more inches to grow.
If it’s any help at all, here is an FAQ I’ve put together so you know my post-manuscript plans. I call them FAQs even though nobody has actually FA’d these Qs of me, really. Oh well. Maybe they can provide some guidance into your own post-mortem—*ahem*, I mean post-novel plans.
·       What’s the title?: I’m not telling you yet. Just know that it is a legit, kick-*** title that I had from Day 1; it was the first word I wrote on the document, and it has stayed unchanged since. I will tell you, though, that the title is NOT:
o   “Another Young Adult Science Fiction Book”
o   “Taserface”
o   “Reflections on Bronte’s ‘Wuthering Heights’”
o   “Reflections on How I Can’t Tell the Bronte Sisters Apart”
o   “Marshmallows”
·       What’s the genre?: Dude, I told you at the beginning of this post. It’s YA sci-fi.
·       Then why is it so long? I thought most YA books were shorter than 91,000 words.: BECAUSE THE STORY IDEA SEEMED SHORTER IN MY HEAD, OK??? I’ll try to cut back in revisions, but I make no guarantees.
·       What’s the plot and setting?: Sorry, I’m a little cagey about those things as well—at least at this stage.
·       Was it inspired by the Hunger Games?: NO. Now go sit in your corner and stop accusing me of such horrible things.
·       Was it inspired by Twilight?: NO! Go to the corner where I left the “Hunger Games” person, who is now free to leave now that you’ve spoken such blasphemy. Besides, that’s fantasy/romance/YA garbage! What gave you the idea I’d go for that?
·       Did you know the whole plot when you sat down to write it?: Yes. No. Sort of. I knew enough of the plot to know how to begin, and I knew how I wanted the story to end, but I’ll admit some stuff shuffled around and changed in the middle as I got writing. I like writing non-set stories; it gives me a little creative wiggle room—and helps me dodge any sticky plot points.
·       What computer did you use?: I wrote a lot of my manuscript during breaks at work, so…*sigh*…it was an Apple. Now I’m a die-hard Windows/Dell fan, but I write for a living anyway (journalist), and writing my manuscript over breaks helped me stay sharp.
·       What’s the last word in the manuscript?: You mean, aside from the word “END” that signals the termination of the story?
·       Duh!: “Gate.”
·       What was your regimen while writing it?: During NaNoWriMo, I wrote 2000 words a day—got me to 50,000 words about a week before November ended. After that, I toned it down to 1000 words a day. Hey, I write a LOT for a living. Yeah, yeah, if you do the math, I missed or under-wrote for a few days after November. I have excuses for those days, a lot of them I can’t remember (aside from the one where I got engaged that day).
·       What are your plans now?: I’m going to hide my manuscript draft under a pillow and not think about it for a month or so. Maybe between now and then, I’ll edit another of my manuscripts or write a short story or something. Heaven knows it’s been a while since I’ve written a short story. (Really, 91,000 words! I’ve never written a story that long before! What happened?) Maybe I’ll just play some Halo. Maybe I’ll do all of the above. After that, then I’ll go through it with my fine-toothed comb that’s missing a few teeth.
·       What are you most looking forward to in your revisions?: I hope I wrote a lot of cool stuff in there that I can find again. I love the (rare) feeling of coming across something you wrote that gave you the creepy fuzzies—which you forgot, so you get to have that feeling all over again. I also haven’t divided the book into chapters yet, so that’ll be fun.
·       What are you least looking forward to in your revisions?: Finding the MANY, MANY ERRORS that necessarily lurk within the pages. I’ve found so many by just glancing back at previous chapters, especially within the first 50,000 words from NaNoWriMo when I was writing at full speed…then there are the creative (a.k.a. “made-up”) words that I know have switched-around letters or changed spellings halfway through…hoo boy, I’ll be trying not to think about those for the next month-ish.
·       What are your feelings about the manuscript and story overall?: AAH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! YAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!...
·       Sorry I asked. That’s not a question. Go to the corner.




Tuesday, January 1, 2019

Rhyming Resolutions


(And a-one, and a-two...)

Greetings, salutations, and happy New Year!

Blessings on writers, all ye far and near.

Time to steel our resolve to make some improvements

And better ourselves and give vices some new dents.

Therefore, here's a taste of my "should"-s and my "can't"-s:

Let's start with my first: write these posts in advance!

Do not see my problem? You'll see what I mean,

When I say THIS was written in 2019.

I've got more for my writing. I need to complete

My latest work-in-progress; the concept is neat,

And I think it's a fun read with elements real.

That leads to the next one: I'd like a book deal.

I resolve to attempt this as calendars change,

But thanks to rejections, my plans rearrange.

Oh well--I'll keep trying. Maybe someday you'll see,

A YA sci-fi book that's written by me!

Also, my short stories have been left aside,

But my wanting-to-write-them has never quite died.

Who knows? With my manuscript near it's last station,

A string of short stories makes a nice vacation.

In non-writing areas, I need to be getting

Myself ready for my eventual wedding.

Read my last post if you don't understand

That I'm quite excited for my future at hand.

So now that I'm done with New Year's resolutions,

I think we can draw some surprising conclusions:

If I need a blog post and am short on time,

My best strategy is some rambling rhyme.


Happy New Year!

Now I'm outta here.